Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig640_p1067_TCunshiu_19072_contig640_p1067_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig647_p626_CGunshiu_19072_contig647_p626_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig674_p239_AGunshiu_19072_contig674_p239_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p106_CAunshiu_19072_contig693_p106_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p120_AGunshiu_19072_contig693_p120_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p162_ACunshiu_19072_contig693_p162_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p187_GAunshiu_19072_contig693_p187_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p315_AGunshiu_19072_contig693_p315_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p477_ACunshiu_19072_contig693_p477_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p541_TCunshiu_19072_contig693_p541_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig693_p604_AGunshiu_19072_contig693_p604_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig7_p65_GAunshiu_19072_contig7_p65_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig71_p434_CTunshiu_19072_contig71_p434_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig71_p462_ACunshiu_19072_contig71_p462_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig71_p483_TAunshiu_19072_contig71_p483_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig719_p658_-Tunshiu_19072_contig719_p658_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig72_p333_GAunshiu_19072_contig72_p333_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig72_p608_CTunshiu_19072_contig72_p608_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig724_p868_C-unshiu_19072_contig724_p868_C-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig724_p925_CTunshiu_19072_contig724_p925_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig724_p938_C-unshiu_19072_contig724_p938_C-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig732_p541_ATunshiu_19072_contig732_p541_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig748_p1121_CTunshiu_19072_contig748_p1121_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig748_p748_TGunshiu_19072_contig748_p748_TGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig748_p802_TCunshiu_19072_contig748_p802_TCgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746