Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig1622_p605_ATunshiu_19072_contig1622_p605_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1658_p302_GTunshiu_19072_contig1658_p302_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1658_p374_TAunshiu_19072_contig1658_p374_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1662_p196_CTunshiu_19072_contig1662_p196_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1662_p362_TCunshiu_19072_contig1662_p362_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1662_p584_TCunshiu_19072_contig1662_p584_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1662_p740_A-unshiu_19072_contig1662_p740_A-genetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1662_p788_AGunshiu_19072_contig1662_p788_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig167_p118_GAunshiu_19072_contig167_p118_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig167_p164_AGunshiu_19072_contig167_p164_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig167_p434_CAunshiu_19072_contig167_p434_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1680_p65_-Aunshiu_19072_contig1680_p65_-Agenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1719_p333_AGunshiu_19072_contig1719_p333_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1719_p434_CTunshiu_19072_contig1719_p434_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1719_p457_CGunshiu_19072_contig1719_p457_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1732_p764_GAunshiu_19072_contig1732_p764_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1738_p431_CTunshiu_19072_contig1738_p431_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1738_p448_CTunshiu_19072_contig1738_p448_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1738_p569_CTunshiu_19072_contig1738_p569_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1755_p351_CTunshiu_19072_contig1755_p351_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1755_p505_TCunshiu_19072_contig1755_p505_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1770_p252_ACunshiu_19072_contig1770_p252_ACgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1777_p1555_-Tunshiu_19072_contig1777_p1555_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1777_p411_AGunshiu_19072_contig1777_p411_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1779_p1033_AGunshiu_19072_contig1779_p1033_AGgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746