Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus

Publication Overview
TitleMining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus
AuthorsChen C and Gmitter FG.
TypeJournal Article
Journal NameBMC Genomics
Volume14
Year2013
Page(s)746
CitationChen C and Gmitter FG. Mining of haplotype-based expressed sequence tag single nucleotide polymorphisms in citrus. BMC Genomics. 2013. 14: 746.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), the most abundant variations in a genome, have been widely used in various studies. Detection and characterization of citrus haplotype-based expressed sequence tag (EST) SNPs will greatly facilitate further utilization of these gene-based resources. RESULTS: In this paper, haplotype-based SNPs were mined out of publicly available citrus expressed sequence tags (ESTs) from different citrus cultivars (genotypes) individually and collectively for comparison. There were a total of 567,297 ESTs belonging to 27 cultivars in varying numbers and consequentially yielding different numbers of haplotype-based quality SNPs. Sweet orange (SO) had the most (213,830) ESTs, generating 11,182 quality SNPs in 3,327 out of 4,228 usable contigs. Summed from all the individually mining results, a total of 25,417 quality SNPs were discovered - 15,010 (59.1%) were transitions (AG and CT), 9,114 (35.9%) were transversions (AC, GT, CG, and AT), and 1,293 (5.0%) were insertion/deletions (indels). A vast majority of SNP-containing contigs consisted of only 2 haplotypes, as expected, but the percentages of 2 haplotype contigs varied widely in these citrus cultivars. BLAST of the 25,417 25-mer SNP oligos to the Clementine reference genome scaffolds revealed 2,947 SNPs had "no hits found", 19,943 had 1 unique hit / alignment, 1,571 had one hit and 2+ alignments per hit, and 956 had 2+ hits and 1+ alignment per hit. Of the total 24,293 scaffold hits, 23,955 (98.6%) were on the main scaffolds 1 to 9, and only 338 were on 87 minor scaffolds. Most alignments had 100% (25/25) or 96% (24/25) nucleotide identities, accounting for 93% of all the alignments. Considering almost all the nucleotide discrepancies in the 24/25 alignments were at the SNP sites, it served well as in silico validation of these SNPs, in addition to and consistent with the rate (81%) validated by sequencing and SNaPshot assay. CONCLUSIONS: High-quality EST-SNPs from different citrus genotypes were detected, and compared to estimate the heterozygosity of each genome. All the SNP oligo sequences were aligned with the Clementine citrus genome to determine their distribution and uniqueness and for in silico validation, in addition to SNaPshot and sequencing validation of selected SNPs.
Features
This publication contains information about 25,417 features:
Feature NameUniquenameType
unshiu_19072_contig1779_p1110_ATunshiu_19072_contig1779_p1110_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1779_p1223_-Tunshiu_19072_contig1779_p1223_-Tgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1787_p212_GTunshiu_19072_contig1787_p212_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1793_p1224_TAunshiu_19072_contig1793_p1224_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1793_p1258_ATunshiu_19072_contig1793_p1258_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1793_p1289_CTunshiu_19072_contig1793_p1289_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1803_p147_GAunshiu_19072_contig1803_p147_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1803_p79_GTunshiu_19072_contig1803_p79_GTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1812_p466_TAunshiu_19072_contig1812_p466_TAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1847_p187_CTunshiu_19072_contig1847_p187_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1847_p503_TCunshiu_19072_contig1847_p503_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1863_p684_AGunshiu_19072_contig1863_p684_AGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p1040_ATunshiu_19072_contig1918_p1040_ATgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p278_TCunshiu_19072_contig1918_p278_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p332_CTunshiu_19072_contig1918_p332_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p587_TGunshiu_19072_contig1918_p587_TGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p786_CTunshiu_19072_contig1918_p786_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p894_CAunshiu_19072_contig1918_p894_CAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p953_GAunshiu_19072_contig1918_p953_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1918_p979_CTunshiu_19072_contig1918_p979_CTgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1936_p123_CGunshiu_19072_contig1936_p123_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1936_p192_TCunshiu_19072_contig1936_p192_TCgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1936_p226_CGunshiu_19072_contig1936_p226_CGgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1936_p330_GAunshiu_19072_contig1936_p330_GAgenetic_marker
unshiu_19072_contig1936_p71_ATunshiu_19072_contig1936_p71_ATgenetic_marker

Pages

Stocks
This publication contains information about 23 stocks:
Stock NameUniquenameType
Alemow pepadaAlemow pepadaaccession
Amakusa tangorAmakusa tangoraccession
Carrizo CitrangeCarrizo Citrangeaccession
ClementineClementineaccession
CleopatraCleopatraaccession
Etrog 861-S1Etrog 861-S1accession
Fortune tangorFortune tangoraccession
Hassaku mandarinHassaku mandarinaccession
Hayata mandarinHayata mandarinaccession
Kankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangorKankitsu Chukanbohon Nou 6 Gou tangoraccession
MexicanMexicanaccession
Orah tangorOrah tangoraccession
Palestine sweet limePalestine sweet limeaccession
PonkanPonkanaccession
Rangur limeRangur limeaccession
Rixiangxia mandarinRixiangxia mandarinaccession
Rough LemonRough Lemonaccession
Satsuma mandarinSatsuma mandarinaccession
summer orangesummer orangeaccession
Sweet OrangeSweet Orangeaccession
Swingle citrumeloSwingle citrumeloaccession
Tahiti limeTahiti limeaccession
Trifoliate orangeTrifoliate orangeaccession
Properties
Additional details for this publication include:
Property NameValue
URLhttp://bmcgenomics.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1471-2164-14-746